Date: 16 May 2001 17:45:28 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Stephen H. Westin) Organization: Cornell University References: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
JP Caputa <email@example.com> writes: > Why is it that all commercial airliners, aside from perhaps > turbo-prop feeder liners and the BAe 146 are low winged, where as > most military cargo planes are high winged. Both types of aircravet > serve very similar roles, and travel over similar ranges. Nope, their roles are quite different. Airliners fly in to nice, civilized airports with jetways, paved runways, and the like. Military transports might have to fly into dirt strips. They also may have no tugs to push them back, so reverse thrust will be needed for ground maneuvering. So getting the engines far from the ground is a Good Thing to avoid having them inhale something solid. And cargo is unloaded from airliners by lots of nice machinery, rather than being driven or towed off. So a low cabin floor is very nice to have in a military plane. > I can understand that the purpose of the high winged cargo transports is > to have the floor of the plane closer to the ground for easier loading > of cargo, but I'd figure this should be an equally important factor for > the airlines. Not as important as making it convenient for passengers. Actually, I suspect that mechanized cargo handling systems (especially for containerized freight) make this point moot. The equipment is bought for efficiency, and would be there in any case; it just reduces the advantage of a low cargo deck. > So essencially, the question is: > > WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF LOW WINGED AIRCRAFT (if any) AS OPPOSED TO HIGH > WINGED AIRCRAFT? Well, a low-wing aircraft gets more benefit from ground effect at takeoff and landing. It lets the wing spar pass through the cargo area, rather than intruding into cabin headroom. It also is compatible with worldwide infrastructure built up over the past 45 years or so. Not to mention the chance to mount landing gear on a low wing, giving a nice wide stance without lots of extra structure. Regional airliners have a mission much more similar to that of military transports: more primitive airfields with less infrastructure for ground handling. So it makes sense for them to use high wings. -- -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.