Re: Boeing's Sonic Cruiser

Date:         19 Apr 2001 16:40:16 
From:         "Scotty" <nospam@att.net>
Organization: remove X's to reply
References:   1 2
View raw article
  or MIME structure

I sort of doubt that this is an engineering-representative design drawing.
At least, it seems apparent the systems-E folks have not had a good hack at
it yet.

"Don Stokes" <don@news.daedalus.co.nz> wrote in message
news:airliners.2001.152@ditka.Chicago.COM...
> In article <airliners.2001.83@ditka.Chicago.COM>,
> Damon Hill <damon@halcyon.com> wrote:
> >Will it fly?  Will the airlines buy?  I hope so!  Commercial
> >aircraft design has been SO boring for the past couple of
> >decades.
> >
> >How fast WILL it go?  It already looks supersonic, with the right
> >engines.
> >
> >http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/concept/
>
> Doesn't look supersonic to me.  Note:
>
> - Large engine pods to house high-bypass engines -- not efficient for
>   supersonic cruise
>
> - Decidedly sub-sonic looking nose section
>
> - Large canards -- the Tu-144 used (smaller) canards to keep the nose up
>   at low speed, but retracted them for supersonic flight.
>
> Also note that the painting looks heavily area-ruled, and I suspect the
> fuselage would provide significant lift -- it appears to have a low floor
> although it's hard to tell from the published painting.  That would move
> the centre of lift further forward than would appear from just looking
> at the wing planform.
>
> Does anyone else think it looks like a grown-up version of the Starship?
>
> -- don