Re: Boeing naming convention for 777

Date:         04 Sep 99 11:38:42 
From:         kls@ohare.Chicago.COM (Karl Swartz)
Organization: Chicago Software Works, Menlo Park, California
References:   1 2 3 4
Followups:    1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

>As I understand it, the PW4074
>and 4077 are the same, but the FADEC for the 4074 limits the fuel flow and
>there are probably slightly different stator vane schedules to limit
>airflow, as well.  I'm not sure how different the 4084 and 4090 are ...

If by PW4077 you mean the engine used on United's sixteen original
(non-ER) 777s, it's a PW4084 run at lower thrust -- I checked out the
model / serial number plate on one of them after seeing a number of
debates over the matter.  The PW4090 (also used by United, on the
777-200(ER)) is different, though all AW&ST's Source Book reveals is
a higher dry weight (15,740 lbs vs 14,995 lbs) and higher pressure

Karl Swartz	|Home
"The average dog is a nicer person than the average person."
  - Andrew A. Rooney