Re: Engine start sequence

Date:         10 Jul 99 02:33:22 
From:         Larry Stone <lds11@cornell.edu>
References:   1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

On 6/25/99 1:33 AM, JF Mezei (jfmezei.spamnot@videotron.ca) said:
>If engine #2 is almost always the first one to be started in commercial
>operations , how come it was called "#2" and not "#1" ?

I don't know for sure but probably because numbering them from
left-to-right is more inuitive since that's the direction we read (in
English and most "Western" languages).

-- Larry Stone
   lds11@cornell.edu
   http://www.enteract.com/~lstone/