Re: Why no Tristars?

Date:         19 Apr 99 02:21:59 
From:         emtgx@aol.com (EMTGX)
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
References:   1
Followups:    1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

My guess is
- They didn't build as many of them to start.
- They stopped making them early on (so now all the tristars are pretty old).
- They didn't have a derivative like the DC-10 had with the MD-11.
- They never sold much in Europe in the first place (BA had many, but most
other carriers went with A300's and DC-10's)
It's all too bad since there never was a man-made object more beautiful than a
tristar's tail...

-------------------
General Tso
   "Mr. Osato believes in a healthy chest"   Helga Brandt