Date: 31 Dec 99 02:09:34 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (PS2727) Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com References: 1 Followups: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
I think the answer to your question lies in the task given the designers of autoflight systems. If one parameter is to allow for pilot input while autopilots are engaged this would not be a problem. Unfortunately pilots sometimes don't fully understand the implications of "helping" the autopilot in its job. Most airplanes I have flown have cautions about overriding autopilot inputs and to disconnect it if its not doing what you want. The elevator trim movement by the autopilot looks at only one thing: it seeks to relieve pressure on the actuator by trimming the stabilizer so that the elevator is faired to the stab. If the actuator is holding constant down elevator to maintain level flight it will trim the stab to relieve the force and unload the actuator. Now if the pilot applies up pressure the autopilot will add down trim in an attempt to help unload the actuator which is now fighting the pilot input. If it continues, the trim continues to run until it hits the limit. This is the scenario in a few of the accidents and the solution is to train the pilots accordingly. Unfortunately in some cases the pilots did not even know the autopilot(s) were on. This seems amazing until you see how these things work. There is little warning sometimes and requires constant attention to keep up with the mode of operation. Whether its a design flaw is a matter of opinion but I think we have taken a giant step backward in safety by complicating the task rather than by simplifying it.