Date: 29 May 98 02:44:19 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Stephen H. Westin) Organization: Program of Computer Graphics -- Cornell University References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Followups: 1 2 3 4 5
View raw article or MIME structure
email@example.com (C. Marin Faure) writes: > In article <airliners.1998.684@ohare.Chicago.COM>, > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > While I have no idea what drove the decision to retain the existing 737 41 > Section window design (outside of holding down costs), I can say that as > the 757 fuselage is slightly larger in diameter than the 707/727/737 > fuselage, simply grafting a 757 41 section to the front of a New > Generation 737 43 Section won't work. That shocks me; as the '57 was originally an uprated 727, I thought the revisions were limited to nose, tail, and wing. Wasn't the fuselage cross section carried over? <snip> -- -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.