Date: 19 Feb 98 01:33:54 From: "Chris Dahler" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com References: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
> What is the reason that airliners have engines under the wing instead >of on it? The engine on the wing design has been tested on the types of aircraft you mentioned in your post. It is actually easier to build an airplane this way because of the support structure of the engine. However, one can be absolutely sure that aircraft manufacturers would not be building a design were it not efficient, and this is the case with over-the-wing designs: they are aerodynamically inefficient. The disturbance of airflow over the portion of the wing on which the engine sits degrades performance, which all adds up to more fuel being burned. The noise part of your post didn't make much sense. The majority of noise from a jet aircraft does not originate at the engine itself, it originates aft of the exhaust. The roaring you hear is primarily a result of the superhot air expanding rapidly as it leaves the engine, causing a compression wave; this is the same principle that causes thunder following a lightning bolt. Other areas of noise are caused aerodynamically by the tips of the wings and flaps and by the "buzz" heard from modern turbofan engines, which is caused by the tips of the fan blades exceeding the speed of sound as they spin around. Modern turbofan engines are much quieter due to improved core design and also due to the high bypass of relatively unheated air around the core exhaust; this "tube" of unheated exhaust air around the superheated exhaust gases provides a buffer to dampen the shock wave of the exhaust, thus reducing the overall noise. The placement of the engine on top of the wing would not reduce noise by a noticeable amount at all.