Date: 25 Jan 98 03:27:38 From: "seo" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. References: 1 2 3 4 5
View raw article or MIME structure
Filip De Vos wrote in message ... >This (stick-shake and pusher) seems quite strange. I thought the canard >configuration precluded the design from stalling, as is usual with other >Rutan designs. So why did the FAA add the shaker/pusher? There are many reasons which might have rquired a pusher/shaker to be required. A shaker may be required due to either inadequate or non-existant natural (aerodynamic) stall warning in any or all configurations. A pusher may be required due to poor (or even uncertifiable) stall characteristics. To know the exact reasons on this aircraft you would have to ask the manufacturer.