Date: 23 Dec 98 03:52:41 From: JF Mezei <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: 1 2 Followups: 1 2 3 4
View raw article or MIME structure
Karl Swartz wrote: > nuts. It's also increasingly the case that flight crews are trained > in managing the automation, sacrificing basic systems knowledge, so > they aren't equipped to deal with what happens when those systems > fail you. Before someone gets to fly those fancy automated passenger planes, doesn't he/she *HAVE* to start with small planes such as CESSNAs and progress upwards as their experience/fliying hours increase ? If that is the case, isn't flying "manual" somewhat like riding a bike, something you don't really forget ? So, when your instruments fail you on one of them fancy planes, shouldn't the pilots still be able to fly by the seat of their pants which is what they did when they started off on those small planes ? Also just curious, if the airspeed indicator is inop, shouldn't the pilot still be able to get some idea of his speed through the INS/GPS systems which would provide ground speed ?