Date: 20 Nov 98 02:30:37 From: JF Mezei <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: 1 2
View raw article or MIME structure
J P McLaughlin wrote: > Both of those a/c were descending as quickly as they thought prudent and > both appear to have lost control before being low enough to consider any > kind of controlled landing--airport or not. But this doesn't answer the initial question. In both SR111 and Valuejet cases, the pilots were still heading for an airport and acted so until they lost control. In such cases, would it not increase the survavibility rates if pilots chose to crash land ASAP instead of aiming for next airport ? I.E. would survavibility not increase if pilot crash lands before loosing control of aircraft compared to loosing control while still in the air ? But this bring up the question of the decision to lose all hope to reach airport and crash land. I guess by the time the situation gets dire enough for this decision to become obvious, it is too late anyways. My gut feeling would be to bring aircraft down ASAP to about 500 feet altitude and then make the way to the airport. If you lose control, then you don't fall from as high, if you make it to airport, then the only harm will be the fact that you flew so low..