Date: 28 Jun 98 18:47:39 From: Chuanga@cris.com (H Andrew Chuang) Organization: Concentric Internet Services References: 1 2 3 4 Followups: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1998.920@ohare.Chicago.COM>, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >Along these lines, I was surprised at how uncomfortable Cathay Pacific's >economy class is on the A330. Although they have one of the best economy >class seats I've ever experienced, they jam them in so tight that when the >seat in front of you reclines, it completely jams you in -- there's simply no >way to get out, if you're not a contortionist, without having the person in >front lift his seat back. Here too, it seems to be a case of giving all the >space to the folks in front. I guess not being tall is not that bad after all. ;-) For Cathay, the seating in the A330 is a great improvement over the L-1011 which the A330 replaces. (Cathay's L-1011 was configured with ten-abreast economy seating instad of the usual nine-abreast one.) Cathay's A330 is used mostly on regional routes, and East Asians are on the average smaller. Perhaps, that's why Cathay use the tighter configuration to maximize its revenue without annoying the majority of its customers. P.S. Cathay's new B777-300 are configured with 3-3-3 economy seating instead of the 2-5-2 which is used on Cathay's B777-200. Cathay claims the new configuration was chosen for cabin crew convenience! P.P.S. Cathay is seeking potential customers to lease the four B777-200As that it owns. The -200A and the A330 cater to nearly the identical market sector. Having both in the fleet simply doesn't make too much sense.