Date: 16 Apr 97 01:55:59 From: email@example.com (Mike Neus) Organization: Texas Instruments References: 1 2
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1997.868@ohare.Chicago.COM>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... >In article <airliners.1997.818@ohare.Chicago.COM> email@example.com writes: >> The forward cargo door was seen by primary radar and human eyes as it >> departed TWA 800. It left first of all the pieces to go, and landed >> closest to the takeoff point. The door has failed before. The effect of >> departing caused an explosive decompression which was recorded on the >> cockpit voice recorder as a sudden loud sound just before an abrupt power >> cut. The cut occurred when the nose separated from the rest of the body by >> the force of the 300 knot slipstream crumpling the nose into the cargo >> door hole caused crease. > >Please explain how UA811 returned safely to Hawaii, while TW800 fell >into the ocean when allegedly the same thing happened. Not only that, but he faults Pan Am 103 to a faulty cargo door when a bomb blew it out of the sky. Just another troll at work... -- Because the junk mailers of the world think my address is their play thing, my e-mail address will not be revealed. Thank the junk mailers for ruining the internet.