Re: Boeing 777 - Totally Irresponsible?

Date:         04 Jan 97 03:55:52 
From:         jfmezei <>
Organization: SPC
References:   1 2 3
Followups:    1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

Robert Dorsett wrote:
> and say "THIS is the way it's done."  We're still on the learning curve.
> A brand new learning curve.  It's a learning curve that will be hard-
> fought, and that will by necessity be very proprietary, very institutional.
> The lessons and processes will stay with their originators, and will not
> be shared.

Five years from now, the 777's systems will look "OLD and ANTIQUATED",
just as the 767's systems are no longer state of the art and DC9 systems
are fit for museums.

When the 747 came out, I am sure some feared flying in it because it was
so big and feared it would not take off etc.

Anything new attracts fear. But after a few years of operation, people
forget about those fears and focus on something else.

When microwave ovens came along, there were fears of cancer due to
microwave leaks. Now, those are barely mentioned.

When you look back over the history, you don't find any revolutions, you
find an evolution.

FBW is just another step from direct mechanical controls, some of them
being hydrolically assisted, some of them being hydrolically driven,
some of them being electrically driven, and now, FBW simply means that
there are no remaining direct controls and all are electrically

In the same veins, FMCs have also evolved from being able to keep
heading/altitude, to being able to have waypoints and change in
direction, to being able to autoland, and now, being able to judge
actions relative to the capabilities of the aircraft.

The Airbus and 777 systems are "revolutionary" only in being the first
generations where plane systems start to talk/monitor each other to have
a more complete view of what is going on (as opposed to portions
operating totally independantly from each other with only the pilot to
monitor what is really going on).