Date: 18 Mar 97 03:14:54 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Larry Stone) Organization: InterServe Communications, Inc. References: 1 2 3 Followups: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1997.620@ohare.Chicago.COM>, kls@ohare.Chicago.COM (Karl Swartz) wrote: >Before the debate resurges on how such a plane gets to Hawaii if it >doesn't have the range for the trip, there's been much past debate on >this point. See http://www.chicago.com/airliners/archives.html for >those old discussions. Obviously some range is gained by flying with >no payload and possibly at slower speeds and/or lower altitudes. Higher altitude, not lower. The higher you go, the less you burn. Of course, you have to be able to get there in the first place and not burn so much fuel doing so that it offsets any gain from cruising that high. The decreased burn is so dramatic, UA 757's between SFO and SNA (323 nautical miles) routinely operate at FL410 (41,000 feet). -- -- Larry Stone --- email@example.com http://www.interserve.com/~lstone/ Belmont, CA, USA My opinions, not United's.