Re: Are Two Engine 757 & 767 Jets Dangerous? [Was the DC-3???]

Date:         04 Jan 97 03:55:47 
From:         kls@ohare.Chicago.COM (Karl Swartz)
Organization: Chicago Software Works, Menlo Park, California
References:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7
View raw article
  or MIME structure

>Stop all this ETOPs silliness.

>Well, was the DC3 dangerous?

The Super DC-3's range was 1,900 nm, only slightly short of enough to
fly SFO-HNL (2,084 nm).  Given its 218 kts cruise speed, it would be
well over four hours away from land at mid-point.  Even assuming it
had the range, would you claim such a flight would not be dangerous?

Keep in mind the first case of a large airliner ditching involved a
Boeing 377 Stratocruiser, which had two engines fail near midpoint of
an LAX-HNL flight.  It's PW R-4360 Wasp radials were advanced (and
perhaps overstressed) versions of the R-1830 Wasps used on the DC-3.
(DC-3s also used Wright GR-1820 Cyclones.)

Yes, in that environment, a DC-3 would have been very dangerous.  A
modern jet, regardless of how many engines it has, is dangerous in
such an environment, too, though far less so than a DC-3.

--
Karl Swartz	|Home	kls@chicago.com
		|Work	kls@netapp.com
		|WWW	http://www.chicago.com/~kls/
Moderator of sci.aeronautics.airliners -- Unix/network work pays the bills