Re: Boeing cancels 747-500X/600X?

Date:         09 Mar 97 12:39:32 
From: (Don Stokes)
Organization: Victoria University of Wellington
References:   1 2 3 4
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

In article <>,
Alan Wong  <> wrote:
>At present, a 747-400 flying from Los Angeles to Sydney is severely payload
>limited (I believe no cargo and 100 empty seats). Also Singapore to London

Dunno about cargo, but last time I flew LAX-SYD non-stop the flight was
*packed*.  There wasn't a single empty seat, let alone 100.

>The 777-200X, although larger than any likely 767 derivative, seems to be
>the answer. With a longer range than the 747-400, it may even be used
>for marginal 747-400 routes such as Sydney - Los Angeles or Singapore -
>London. And with a better frequency too.

Smaller planes would mean better frequency, although I suspect that the
777 is sufficiently large that it wouldn't make much difference to
scheduling, but using a twin would improve the economics of the route.

Don Stokes, Network Manager, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. +64 4 495-5052 Fax+64 4 471-5386