Re: A340-500/600 vs. B777-200X/B747-200X etc.

Date:         29 Nov 97 03:24:24 
From:         k_ish <kenishZZZ@ix.netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom
References:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Followups:    1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

Karl Swartz wrote:
> These don't really overlap because the 767-200 is no longer offered.
> (It's still built as a military airframe, though.)

I was totally unaware the 767-200 was ever in military use, except for
the prototype airborne laser testbed with the cupola on top.  Please
educate me.

Thanks;
Ken Ishiguro