Date: 27 Aug 97 03:57:53 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Joel S Cole) References: 1 2 3 4 5
View raw article or MIME structure
I found it interesting that you say some operators land DC10-30 with CLG retracted to save landing fee costs. I know that you can land with CLG retracted, but I thought there was a GW penalty or a special inspection required in cases of an emergency landing. There are some potential consequence. (I know there is a TOGW penalty.) Several parts of the Main L/G are Life Limited; with different limits for different TOGWs. Life Limits are the total landing cycles a part can be flown based on fatigue tests. Operating the DC10-30 with CLG Retracted requires tracking these parts and additional parts to a new set of Life Limits. Granted, this difference is small and operators probably do not track the cycles for CLG Stowed for one or two landing. Here are some examples: PART NO. & NAME L I F E L I M I T S CLG Extended CLG stowed ARG7312 MLG Piston 65,000 63,800 total cyc. ARG7331 Torque Link 27,300 23,900 ARG7558 Fwd Trun Bolt -0- 41,600 ARG7322 Side Brace 53,000 41,520 Note the Center L/G is considered a redundant structure and is not critical to landing loads. Therefore there are no Life Limited parts in Center L/G Assembly. You can see the effect on the Main L/G parts if the aircraft is operated with CLG stowed. One part, the Fwd Trunnion Bolt, does not normally have a life limit but when CLG is stowed it is required to be tracked. Taking the worse case part, the Side Brace, if 100 landing cycles are flown with CLG stowed, it is equivalent of accumulating 127 cycles flying with the CLG. 100 cycles[CLG stowed] X (53,000)/(41520) = 127 Or stated another way; Ratio [100/41520] = Ratio [127/53000] Bean counter would think of it in these terms: A $150,000-part expends $2.83 of its total life per landing vs $3.61 for CLG stowed(using the Brace's figures). Then applying the 127/100 cycle conversion, this would equate to $4.58--a 60% increase in cost.(*) Now, concerning A/C Jacking to stow CLG. The CLG can be retracted with the A/C on the ground but the strut pressure MUST be bled off. If not, the Retract Actuator will pull the CLG up and internal pressure will extend the Piston, causing damage to the Retract Actuator and possibly the Lock Links. Conversely, to extend the CLG on the ground, it can be done by deflating the shock strut, extending the gear until fully locked and servicing the Strut. But then the CLG strut service must be done with a strut keeper installed. If this GSE part is not available, then the next best method is to jack the A/C and fully extend the CLG strut--taking you back to where you started. I hope this info is helpful. United and American were NOT even tracking the Life Limited parts until a few years ago, so don't be surprised if many are not aware of this requirement. STeve Cole~ STeveC00@juno.com (*) I disclaim any errors in my cost analysis. PS: In my questionable cost analysis, I think I could be accused of double jeopardy. I applied a cycle "cost" and then multiplied it by difference in part usage cost: probably should not have done both. Realistically the cost factor would be about 10% or so.