Date: 05 Aug 97 17:45:50 From: "Pete Adler" <email@example.com> References: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1997.1664@ohare.Chicago.COM> firstname.lastname@example.org "Matthew Kranz" writes: >Thursday morning's crash of the FedEx MD-11 in Newark has prompted me to >pose a question to the group. Does the MD-11 have less-than-optimum >flare and landing characteristics? In addition to FedEx's crash (and >previous hard landing) of N611FE, I saw a Delta MD-11 make an arrival (I >wouldn't call it a landing <g>) at CVG a few months ago that was, >obviously quite hard. The plane touched down heavily somewhere between >the threshold and the 500-foot mark after little or no flare, and >bounced 5-10 feet in the air before touching down again. There have been problems associated with the MD-11 especially in the flare regime. This occurs with both autoland, and manual approaches. It is my understanding that primarily this occurs because there was a reduction in the size of the elevator to reduce both drag and weight on the aircraft. This reduction allowed the aircraft to meet its promised spec range and payload guarantees. Unfortunately, the aircraft became dynamically unstable in certain regimes of flight. This was resolved with a software change that supposedly resolved the instability issues. The first few hard-landing incidents that occured with the MD were with auto-land engaged. This prompted a ban on auto-lands and manual approaches only. Shortly thereafter, another hard-landing with auto-land prompted a ban on auto-lands with manually flown approaches only. This also did not solve the problem.