Re: possible new engine for the B777-200X

Date:         11 Jul 97 02:09:29 
From: (H Andrew Chuang)
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
References:   1 2
Followups:    1 2
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

In article <airliners.1997.1411@ohare.Chicago.COM>,
jfmezei  <"jfmezei"[no.spam]> wrote:
>H Andrew Chuang wrote:
>> With Singapore Airlines (along with American Airlines) as the most
>> likely launch customer for the B777-200X, I think it would be quite
>> appropriate for Boeing to launch the new derivative at the 1998 Asian
>> Aerospace Show in Singapore next February.
>My image of American Airlines is not one of a long range route network.
>(Not much in terms of Asia, and just short hops to europe on smallish

Up to now, AA's interest in Asia seems to be limited to Japan only.
However, AA has just announced that it will start codeshare services
to Taipei via Vancouver with Canadian International.  The new
service is made possible because of the ealier open skies bilateral
with Canada and the more recent one with Taiwan.  AA also has
codeshare services between Chicago and Singapore on 12 of SQ's 26
trans-Pacific flights out of LAX and SFO.  I'm not sure about AA's
long term plan for Asia, but the recent codeshare agreements do
indicate AA has shown stronger commitment to the region than before.

AA's interest in the B777-200X is an important factor in Boeing's
shelving of the B777-100X.  (If the report by Flight International
is correct, AA is also interested in the B777-300X which doesn't
make too much sense with AA's existing network.) Early last year,
soon after having secured B777 orders from Singapore and Malaysia,
Boeing ran an ad campaign in the Far East boasting the versatility
of the B777 family (i.e., the -100X, -200, and -300) for Asian
carriers.  Even not too long ago, SQ still has expressed preference
for the -100X.  Now, Boeing is trying to convince SQ that the -100X
is simply too small.

>Would American really need a very long range airplane ? What routes
>would it use them on ? (existing , new or "wishful thinking" routes ?)

>From Dallas and Chicago (AA's major hubs), ultra-long-range planes are
needed for destinations like Taipei, Hong Kong, Bangkok, Manila, etc.
However, yields on non-Japanese trans-Pacific routes are traditionally
low.  Hong Kong may be a little bit better.  Currently, UA is the only
carrier with more than two daily flights between the US and HKG.  With
the new CLK airport, HKG should not be overlooked (but then again, DL
did not make it the first time).  Cathay is expected to make a major
expansion to the US when the CLK airport opens next year.  Thus,
competition can be very tough in HKG.

With a booming economy and a large Vietnamese popluation in the US,
Ho Chi Minh City (formerly Saigon) should have a great potential.  At
this time, there is no direct link between the two countries.  Airlines
like CX, BR, CI, etc., are carrying a lot of six-freedom traffic
between the US and Vietnam.

Bangkok is underserved, so are Jakarta and Manila.  The national
airlines of the latter two citis have less than desirable image.
Thus, they may offer some opportunities for the US carriers like AA.

Well, just some random thoughts.