From: Bradg@io.org (Brad Gillies) Date: 25 Jan 96 00:54:59 Organization: Internex Online, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (416 363 3783) Followups: 1 2
View raw article or MIME structure
The theory behind winglets is to INCREASE the EFFECTIVE length of the wing without increasing the SPAN. In order to effectively achieve this goal the winglet must be rather large in size. The A310 and A320 winglets are too small to be really effective although they do give a small increase in efficiency. The winglet itself (on a 747-400) is relatively light as it is made of carbon fibre and graphite composites. So weight is not really the issue. The 777 has no real need for the winglet as the wing design is very efficient and you will notice it is also long. Effectively achieving the same goal only with an increase in span. This is why they came up with the folding wing option. This was to accomodate the aircraft on gates spaced for smaller aircraft (757,767 etc). The need never (not yet) arose for the option due to the availability of wider spaced gates designed for the 747 and such. The only hitch is gate scheduling. I recently (2years ago) had the opportunity to get involved with an aircraft (727) which was modified with winglets (Valsan Modification) The aircraft achieved a 5% decrease in fuel burn and a faster time to cruise altitude. I hardly think that is anything to scoff at. There are people who think it is not worth it and there are people who think it works great. I (obviously) am a proponent of the winglet and its advantages. I have seen it work with my own eyes in real life flying not in some wind tunnel or computer. Flying is the true test. They work. Brad These opinions are mine and mine alone. I am not affiliated with any of the above mentioned companies or their subsidiaries.