Re: safety

Date:         27 Dec 96 13:32:18 
From:         gfoley@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Gerard Foley)
Organization: The Greater Columbus Free-Net
References:   1 2
Followups:    1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

Kian-Tat Lim (ktl@crl.com) wrote:
: In article <airliners.1996.2797@ohare.chicago.com>,
: Andrew Weir  <100637.616@CompuServe.COM> wrote:
: >It seems to me, [...] that if the accident rate is to continue to fall,
: >aviation regulators [...] may have to insist on all those myriad
: >recommendations made by investigators over the years that have not been
: >acted upon, e.g.  rear-facing seats, full cargo hold fire detection,
: >smoke hoods, cabin and/or cargo hold fire suppression systems,
: >greater impact friendliness of the airframe, and much more efficient
: >incident reporting.

: 	Most of the suggestions made above, though undoubtedly made by
: safety authorities, have more to do with *survivability* in the event
: of a crash than *crash prevention*.


<snip>

   Promotion of survivability reminds passengers that accidents happen.
The more obtrusive the survival equipment, the less likely it is that
anyone will let it got aboard a commercial aircraft.



--
Gerry