Date: 13 Dec 96 04:26:01 From: "Mark A. Brown" <email@example.com> References: 1 2 Followups: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
Dear all, Re terrain models for CFIT avoidance In at least one terrain referenced nav system for military a/c that I know of, a database is employed along with a laser radar that scans ahead of the vehicle. It is reported to be able to pick out a power pylon at a distance of several miles in pouring rain. Otherwise its a bit embarressing when your deadly foe just stops your multi-zillion zloty whizzbang wonderplane with a lo-tech high wall or barrage balloons. I'd agree with Robert in that high accuracy isn't needed for situational awareness. Even in areas of the map which are not too good, one has an MSA. The database designer could simply use the "worse case" terrain model or just use a "plateau" at 2000 ft (or 1000ft) below the MSA for the area. Some pilots might suggest that this could be dangerous due to what you see out of the window not matching expectation, I suppose. However, the display is supposed to improve SA, not be a substitute for looking out of the window, and if you can see out clearly anyway (VMC), you wouldn't need the display. Some parts of the world are mapped very well. I've got some data from an agency in Japan which can supply you with satellite derived height data for the whole of Japan on various grid densities (250 metres, 50 metres, 1 km). The heights are in decimeters (0.1m) although I don't know if this is the true accuracy. I'll be using this data for experiments with a 3D version of EGPWS, maybe adding a velocity vector (if the VV is on the hillside and the hillside is close, you could be in trouble!) and autopilot programmed flight path (for vertical path awareness) as well as experimenting with colour-coding. Back to lurking, Mark.