Date: 18 Nov 96 10:11:13 From: Ed Hahn <firstname.lastname@example.org> Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Va. References: 1 2 3
View raw article or MIME structure
"tom (t.) lismer" <email@example.com> writes: > This is my understanding. Also, the engines used are turbo-jets, as > opposed to turbo-fans, which have a higher exhaust velocity. The TU-144 > had turbofans and needed afterburners. Also, just about every fighter I > know of has turbofan engines, and will hence need afterburners for > supersonic flight. While the turbojets on the Concorde probably do have a faster exhaust velocity than the turbofans on the TU-144, this fact has nothing to do with whether turbofan engines *require* afterburners for supersonic flight. The reason being: the exhaust velocity can (and is) altered by the exhaust nozzle geometry. There is nothing inherent about the turbofan design which would prohibit supersonic cruise merely because of bypass. Finally as the ultimate proof: The YF22 and YF23 both had turbofans, and could cruise supersonically without afterburners. The F22 will have this capability with turbofans as well. ed -------- Ed Hahn | firstname.lastname@example.org | (703) 883-5988 -------- The above comment reflects the opinions of the author, and does not constitute endorsement or implied warranty by the MITRE Corporation. Really, I wouldn't kid you about a thing like this.