Re: ETOPS

From:         GWilson404@aol.com
Date:         21 Oct 96 02:51:36 
References:   1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

In article <airliners.1996.2015@ohare.Chicago.COM>, cp@panix.com (Charles
Platt) writes:

>By this argument, double or triple redundancy in instruments or control
>systems should also be removed, since the more electronics or the more
>hydraulic lines you have, the greater the chance there is for one of them
>to fail.

Quite right in a sense and this philosophy is applied in satellite design as
I found out in a brief period of involvement with the space side of aerospace
working on spaceplanes. On a satellite where there's no opportunity for
maintenance,  the systems are often simplex, but designed to be ultra ultra
reliable. Minimises weight and maximises reliability.

Its also a fair point in respect of VSTOL aircraft, since its extremely
difficult to protect against engine failure in the vertical phase (ref
Harrier/AV8). Therefore better to only have onte engine.

Gerald Wilson