From: email@example.com (Scott Odle) Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc. Date: 21 Oct 96 02:29:19 References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1996.1972@ohare.Chicago.COM>, kls@ohare.Chicago.COM says... > >While the FAA was once very retentive about type designations (see >past discussions about why the L-1011-385-1-14 has such a cumbersome >moniker), I thought they eased up and let MD use MD-88 as the official >designation, without forcing a new TC just for a name change. > And what do you base this statement on? I have worked for the ACO for many quite some time and to my knowledge nothing has changed when it comes to designations. The applicant can call it anything they like as long as it is clearly listed as a different model.