From: email@example.com (Scott Odle) Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc. Date: 12 Oct 96 02:36:01 References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1996.1972@ohare.Chicago.COM>, kls@ohare.Chicago.COM says... > >Jennings Heilig wrote: >>Terrell D. Drinkard wrote: >>> I'm pretty sure that all the MD-80/90 aircraft have the same type >>> certificate as the DC-9. Could you double check your references? > >> Nope, Karl is correct. McDD got a new type certificate for the >>MD-88, and I believe that somehow they got it to cover the MD-80/81/ >>82/83/87 as well ... >>... If you look at the >>airworthiness certificate on the front bulkhead sometime you'll see >>what it's listed as... All of DL's are listed as TYPE: MD-88 > >While the FAA was once very retentive about type designations (see >past discussions about why the L-1011-385-1-14 has such a cumbersome >moniker), I thought they eased up and let MD use MD-88 as the official >designation, without forcing a new TC just for a name change. > >The MD-90, as I heard it, was the first of the DC-9 series to have a >completely new type certificate. I looked thru http://www.faa.gov but >couldn't find anything relevant, unfortunately. They did not receive new type certificates. The MD-90 was added as a new model to the existing type certificate. Also, nothing has eased up for as long as I can remember. There are numurous type certificates with multiple model designations on them, many of which have existed for quite a long time. In response to another post, the airworthiness certificate diplayed in the aircraft has little to do do with what models are listed on a Type Certificate and its associated Type Certificate Data Sheet. The only requirement is the model designation is shown using the same designation as the TC and TCDS.