From: M.J.Jennings@amtp.cam.ac.uk (Michael Jennings) Organization: University of Cambridge DAMTP Date: 11 Oct 96 19:44:51 References: 1 Followups: 1
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <airliners.1996.1989@ohare.Chicago.COM>, IMacduff <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >I would like to hear others views on where advances in aeronautics will >take us and how far away is the end. I find it curious that the basic >design of airliners hasn't changed that much ( nothing revolutionary >anyway) since the 707. How efficient can you make jet engines? Do higher >speeds (supersonic) come free or will they always require compromise (ie >fuel efficiency, safety, approach speeds)? Are there any revolutionary >aerodynamic designs still untried in the wind tunnels or computer >simulations? > >I believe that fifty years from now we will be flying airliners very >similar to todays, with only minor enhancements. They will still be >almost entirely subsonic and have very similar overall performance. Mature technologies can be overthrown, however. I doubt that manual typewriters changed all that much between 1900 and 1980, aprt from incremental improvements. However, technology then produced something better and they were then superceded completely. I believe that something similar will at some point happen with commercial air travel. Do I think we will be still flying in subsonic aircraft similar to what we have now in 20 years time? Yes. Do I think we will e still flying in subsonic aircraft similar to what we have now in 50 years time? Maybe. Do I think we will be still flying in subsonic aircraft similar to what we have now in 100 years time. No. Michael. -- Michael Jennings Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics The University of Cambridge. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/mjj12 email@example.com "A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason" -- Tom Paine.