From: firstname.lastname@example.org Organization: The Communications Research Centre Date: 10 Feb 96 12:30:51 References: 1 2
View raw article or MIME structure
kls@ohare.Chicago.COM (Karl Swartz) wrote: >I read this and scoffed, as I did when they talked about instruments >on the 777 being unreadable due to engine vibrations. Sounds pretty >absurd, right? Just shut the engine down! >Then, nearly at the end of the article, they mentioned windmilling >engines and it dawned on me that just shutting the engine down isn't >good enough, since it will still windmill and thus still produce a >pretty decent vibration if it's massively out of balance. One of the major issues in trying to read instruments in a vibrating environment has to do with the elasticity of the human spine. I recall reading somewhere that the spine has a natural frequency at about three cycles per second. At this point, the head would be bouncing up and down so violently that focussing on anything would be impossible. So even a glass cockpit, which doesn't suffer the problems of vibrating needles making them unreliable indicators, can become useless in certain circumstances. The engine certification tests must show containment in the engine casing of rotor blade and disk fragments in the event of worst-case failure, and the recent PBS series on the B777 clearly showed some of these tests. The effect on the airframe and its inhabitants of continued vibration from a windmilling engine with a blade failure may be something else again.