From: firstname.lastname@example.org (W.E. Nichols) Organization: InfiNet Date: 23 Aug 96 13:44:57 References: 1 2
View raw article or MIME structure
astroboy <email@example.com> wrote: +Regarding WWII aircraft, the Soviet IL-2 Sturmovik and American F4U +Corsair (early models only) used exhaust gases to inert the fuel tank +ullage. Everything that I've read indicates that it worked successfully. I found your comment on the F4U interesting, so I asked the question in another group. I am not dispute your statement, it may be correct considering the "early ac changes." I do seem to recall the F4U had self sealing tanks. Here was the answer. Nick, Sorry, but not on the F4U. The pilot's manuals I have or have seen clearly show the CO2 bottle for the wing tank purge and explain it use/operation. There is a second bottle for the blow down of the u/c if the hydraulics are gone. Capt. Blackburn disscusses the system and the fatal (for one pilot) similarity in operation between the two in the early F4Us. I do not know about the IL-2 so will only say it sounds like a bad idea with out some kind of filter and cooling to keep hot particles from touching off the vapor. Gas engine exhaust has a fair percentage of H2O, not something I'd want mixed with my avgas at 20,000ft. Wouldn't put it past the Russians thou'. The original Lexington and Saratoga did use an internal combustion engine to blanket the aviation gas storage and the surrounding voids by pumping the exhaust into the spaces. In 1940(?) the engine had to be increased as the original's output wasn't enough. The reference is in Stern's book "The Lexington Class Carriers". Hope this helps. Ben Schapiro firstname.lastname@example.org Nick W.E. Nichols If a frog has wings, it wouldn't bump it's email@example.com it's ass everytime it jumped.