Re: MD-80: Lawn Dart or Efficient Design?

From:         rickydik@ix.netcom.com (RD Rick)
Organization: Netcom
Date:         18 Aug 96 20:13:34 
References:   1 2 3 4
Followups:    1
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

In <airliners.1996.1644@ohare.Chicago.COM> rdd@netcom.com (Robert
Dorsett) writes:
>
>In article <airliners.1996.1632@ohare.Chicago.COM>
rickydik@ix.netcom.com (RD Rick) writes:
>>Before the two recent 757 crashes, the MD-80 was second in safety.
>                ^^^^^^ only
>>It must be in first place now.
>
>Definitely.  Once one throws out the two crashes during the
>flight-test program.  And the crash in Argentina.  And the NWA crash
>at Detroit.  And the SAS crash in Sweden.  Oh, and the CAL RTO crash
>at La Guardia...
>Apologies if I missed any.

Yeah, you missed some.  It's computed on deaths or accidents per RPM,
revenue passenger mile, or something.  There are over 1,000 MD-80
racking up RPM's right now.

The listing I saw was at a Boeing presentation, where they were
discussing USAir 427 and the 737's fourth place.

RD