Re: prop airliners (was Re: Airbus 3XX on the telly

From:         Michael Carley <mjcarley@maths.tcd.ie>
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Date:         21 Dec 95 14:01:44 
References:   1 2 3 4 5
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

tim@me.rochester.edu (Tim Takahashi) writes:

>I guess during the early 60's speed was everything, so
>the differences between the prop and jet were more dramatic.
>However, the 737-400 is no Convair 880 when it comes to
>cruise speeds. Is a 410mph prop-jet impractical a world
>of 510mph jets?


The strange thing is that, for a given speed, a propeller
is better (more efficient) than a jet. The problems are
that people don't like to fly in propeller aircraft
(``they're not real aeroplanes'') and at high speed,
propellers are very noisy. On the other hand, noisy propellers
keep me in a job, so I don't mind.






--
   "You got your highbrow funk, you got your lowbrow funk, you even
      got a little bit of your pee-wee, pow-wow funk" (Dr. John)
Michael Carley, Mech. Eng., TCD, IRELAND.  m.carley@leoleo.mme.tcd.ie
 <A HREF="http://www.mme.tcd.ie/~m.carley/Welcome.html">Home page</A>