From: email@example.com (Ed Hahn) Organization: The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Va. Date: 23 Feb 94 12:05:49 PST References: 1 2 3 4
View raw article or MIME structure
I remember hearing about the need for ballast in the nose on some British air-craft due to union out-cries when the planes were outfitted with mechanical stairs in the front. After trying to simply remove this option it was found that due to ensuing balance problems they had to put concrete in the nose to solve the problem. Could this be related to this discussion? ______________________________________________________________________ Christopher Hutton dmitri@acs/acs2/cgl/hendrix.bu.edu ------- I don't know about the VC-10 or the Il-62, but on the DC9-1X series, you can't remove the forward airstairs without carrying the same weight in ballast. I understand that TWA, for example, is currently removing the airstairs from all of its DC9s EXCEPT for the DC9-15s it operates to free up some weight. I also seem to recall that the MD80 requires ballast in the forward cargo compartment when being towed around empty to prevent inadvertent wheelies on the taxiway. These were on aircraft without the airstairs installed. I think that the ballast only had to be added when there was less than a specified amount of fuel in the center tank... BTW, there is a tail skid on the B727, but I think it is only there to help if there is over rotation on takeoff. Also, the aft airstairs now have an airspeed switch that prevents the aft airstairs from being lowered in flight. Maintenance crews occassionally call this the "DB Cooper" switch. ed //////// Ed Hahn | firstname.lastname@example.org | (703) 883-5988 \\\\\\\\ The above comment reflects the opinions of the author, and does not constitute endorsement or implied warranty by the MITRE Corporation. Really, I wouldn't kid you about a thing like this.