Re: 707 airframes (Re: Date of Construction)

From:         rdd@netcom.com (Robert Dorsett)
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
Date:         01 Apr 94 13:11:52 PST
References:   1 2 3
Next article
View raw article
  or MIME structure

In article <airliners.1994.1086@orchard.Chicago.COM> jdd@db.toronto.edu (John DiMarco) writes:
>drinkard@bcstec.ca.boeing.com (Terrell D. Drinkard) writes:
>
>>The DC-8 has shown much better economics over the long haul.  Fewer
>>ADs, fewer aging fleet maintenance requirements.  But, all of that came at
>>a price.
>
>I'm not quite clear exactly why this is so. What exactly about the 707 makes
>it less economical than the DC8? 

Load-carrying capacity.  The 707 wasn't able to be stretched as much as the
DC-8, due to its shorter landing gear.    




--              
Robert Dorsett                                                       
rdd@netcom.com