From: email@example.com (Terrell D. Drinkard) Organization: Boeing Computer Services Date: 06 Nov 93 00:24:28 PST References: 1 2
View raw article or MIME structure
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Barrey Jewall <barrey@Novell.COM> wrote: >In <airliners.1993.702@ohare.Chicago.COM> email@example.com >(James R Ebright) writes: > >>How resistant are commercial airliners, especially the newer fly-by-wire >>airframes, to failure due to EMP? > >The short answer: They aren't. > >Reasons: > >1. Weight - Shielding is heavy! > >2. Cost > >Bah I read a piece (in Aerospace?) about an A330 that was hit by lightning during a test flight. Knocked out all the flight test instrumentation, but the flight control computers and related systems were untouched. Quite a vindication for their design. I'm not aware of any requirement to design commercial heavy transports for EMP. Not many commerical flights planned after the emotionally unbalanced sorts start tossing nukes around. We do, however, design for more reasonable criteria, such as flying past a high-power transmitter, or getting struck by lightning. -- Terry firstname.lastname@example.org "Anyone who thinks they can hold the company responsible for what I say has more lawyers than sense."